If someone tells you, resumes should be as complete as possible, and the cover should be beautiful, simple, and generous to match your job search. The intent is consistent; the self-recommendation letter should be simple, clear and refined at the same time, mainly introducing your basic personal information, major, college, job search intention, skills, experience, personality and self-evaluation, blessings, contact information attached, etc., Plus standard official document format. ——I want to say that this person is mostly a teacher in the school, and he has no idea what HR is thinking.
If someone tells you, the resume should be as complete as possible, the time of admission, graduation time, certificates obtained, and all types of training attended. In addition, don’t forget that describing your work experience through a performance statement is not a monotonous job description. ——I want to say that this person is mostly a headhunter, because they think that this kind of resume can increase the shooting rate (it is not necessarily the case).
Many friends would like me to help them make a resume, because somehow I have been in this industry for some years. But it is difficult for me to meet their hopes. I always tell them that you send me the name of your ideal company, the post information and your resume, and I will fix it for you.
Smart you, I wonder if you can understand the difference between making a resume and revising a resume.
Maybe your resume is perfect, the company is well-known, the performance is outstanding, and it is fully qualified for all the content of the job description of the other party, but the company you like does not give you an opportunity to communicate; maybe you have not noticed, the job description says: three Years of work experience; maybe, I’m just saying maybe, the person in charge of the other party’s department is not keen on finding someone to share his responsibilities, he only needs an assistant, but the boss doesn’t think so, so the more perfect you are, the more Failed to pass the department’s review. Of course, there are also a lot of company departments that do not participate in the resume screening, so you are even worse, you have to spend a lot of time to interview, in fact, you may not pass the initial test, the better the performance, the more “death” quick.
Therefore, the point I want to express is: there is no so-called good resume, only resumes that meet the needs of the company; if you want your resume to meet the needs of the other party, you may wish to make certain corrections for each position information.
Many headhunters are keen to ask candidates to describe their work performance. My personal opinion (not necessarily correct): If you must describe performance, one is cautious and the other is simple. Try not to quantify too specific in your resume. Otherwise, it is very likely that the other party will find out a lot of situations that he did not know clearly, but put himself in a passive position; it is also possible that your performance allows the other party to maintain high expectations of you, resulting in harsh interviews. Standard treats you.
You know, the stepping brick is a good brick, so why bother to get a piece of jade.
Bricks and tiles are in the front and pearls and jade are in the back. You might want to keep a little bit of your strengths in your resume. During the interview, you should try to understand the situation of the other party as much as possible, and then decide how much content you need to show.
If you are talking about the content that must be paid attention to when making a resume, I personally think that there is only one thing: the content must be correct, and there must be no mistakes.
